In terms of cast, it has to be said that Gary Oldman looks nothing like Herman Mankiewicz. The olde visuals seem to be the main reason to watch this film, and its this smokey, shadowy, cigarette-burnt, ’40s aesthetic that’s the film’s only positive. The fact that a film about a writer (which intermittently includes script elements) isn’t particularly well written is ironic to say the least. This is basically another love letter to Hollywood’s “great” past like Quentin Tarantino‘s similarly critically overrated shite-fest OUATIH. It's a black and white ode to a period of time that only a select few give a toss about; it’s made for film students, cinephiles, and pompous critics.
前面是鸡血后面是狗血虽然能理解电视剧如果拍的都是专业就没人看了但还是很怀疑真正的投行有这么狗血拍的好像每个人都是傻x不过抛开真实性来说很多剧情还是很有意思的比如no one is innocent; do not need anyone who can read the report, but someone who has the insight; 道德和规定有的时候往往是工具解释权在哪里哪里就是正义总而言之独立性至上、以及独立性也是一切的根基